The 28-70 f:2.6 was Angenieux’s last consumer oriented zoom, designed for Nikon, Minolta and Nikon AF cameras. With a very wide aperture, an all-glass and all-metal construction, it was positioned to compete with the “pro” series zooms of the big three. The tests performed by the specialized press at that time showed that it was THAT good. Unfortunately, its price was also on par with the best of Nicanolta, which made it a tough sale beyond the small circle of admirers of French technology. When Angenieux decided to refocus on professional markets and stopped the production of its consumer oriented lenses, Tokina inherited the design, and their AT-X 287 Series – which was sold as recently as 2007, is a remote descendant of the Angenieux 28-70 AF.
Like any other “full-frame” wide aperture trans-standard zoom, the 28-70 was a large and heavy piece of equipment. It weighted more than 750 g, and needed 77mm filters (it shipped with an Angenieux UV filter, a lens hood, a pouch and two lens caps)
It was fully compatible with original lenses of the big three, which also had its bad side: like an original Minolta lens, the “A” mount version was very loud – when you turn a Minolta AF body on, it calibrates the AF by focusing the lens to the infinite and bringing it back at full speed to the minimum focusing distance, making a big “clonk” in the process.
The lens had a reputation of being prone to vignetting – which was true and no surprise when you consider the f:2.6 maximum aperture and the range of the zoom. Its durability was also questioned by some, but I used the 28-70 as my everyday lens for 12 years, and it did not show any weakness.
Can you still use the 28-70 now, and how does it compare to the best of Nicanolta? To a large extent, it’s a moot point, because the lens is now a very sought after collectible, and its price has no connection with its usage value anymore. A brand new full frame 24-70 zoom from one of the big three, with aspherical glass and a super fast ultra-sonic motor will sell for $1,500 approximatively. No doubt it will outperform a pretty good lens from the early nineties, built for the resolution of film without any special glass or aspheric element. An Angenieux 28-70 AF, if you can find one, may cost you up to $2,000.
And don’t bother to ask. The lens shown on these pictures was sold a few years ago, to a collector in China, to pay for my first dSLR, which is now completely obsolete. Isn’t it sad?
More about the Angenieux 28-70 2.6 AF