<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CamerAgX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameragx.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameragx.com</link>
	<description>A new life for old gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smart phones and photography &#8211; a follow up by jim biggs</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2010/10/04/smartphones-and-photography-a-follow-up/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim biggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=1990#comment-705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that hood ornament is from a 1957 chevrolet,not a 1954]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that hood ornament is from a 1957 chevrolet,not a 1954</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Price of Used Cameras by xtalfu</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/520/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xtalfu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/520/#comment-700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That must be the Olympus 50mm f:1.8]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That must be the Olympus 50mm f:1.8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Price of Used Cameras by Mau</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/520/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/520/#comment-699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What lens is on that OM-1 above?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What lens is on that OM-1 above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Single Lens Reflex or Rangefinder Camera? A few days with a Leica CL by Vladan Jacimovic</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2010/01/17/single-lens-reflex-or-rangefinder-camera/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladan Jacimovic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=428#comment-649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May I know who is the author of the photography called &quot;Canal St Martin - Paris&quot;? For the class purposes I have to find photographs made by the 35mm Rangefinder Camera (film), so I thought of using this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I know who is the author of the photography called &#8220;Canal St Martin &#8211; Paris&#8221;? For the class purposes I have to find photographs made by the 35mm Rangefinder Camera (film), so I thought of using this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon F3 by lobomella</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2009/09/30/nikon-f3/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lobomella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.wordpress.com/?p=331#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I had all the money to spend, I would LOVE to own one &quot;F&quot; of each professional body.
Right now I&#039;m considering getting my first one: an F4s.
So far I only own an EM and an F80, but I would love to add more to the collection.

Great blog, by the way.

Lobo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had all the money to spend, I would LOVE to own one &#8220;F&#8221; of each professional body.<br />
Right now I&#8217;m considering getting my first one: an F4s.<br />
So far I only own an EM and an F80, but I would love to add more to the collection.</p>
<p>Great blog, by the way.</p>
<p>Lobo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Minolta Vectis S-1: APS done right? by lobomella</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2009/09/20/the-minolta-vectis-s-1-aps-done-right/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lobomella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=726#comment-557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never got a chance to use more than 2 or 3 APS rolls of film.
To this day I&#039;ve always wanted to learn more about this short-lived format.
I kind of wish I had a roll just as a keepsake.

Great blog; I will return for more.

Lobo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never got a chance to use more than 2 or 3 APS rolls of film.<br />
To this day I&#8217;ve always wanted to learn more about this short-lived format.<br />
I kind of wish I had a roll just as a keepsake.</p>
<p>Great blog; I will return for more.</p>
<p>Lobo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leica M9 &#8211; a few thoughts by xtalfu</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2009/09/10/leica-m9-a-few-thoughts/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xtalfu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 02:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=552#comment-546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the comment.
In all fairness I have to say that it&#039;s getting increasingly difficult to get film processed at an acceptable price. The payback of a Leica M9 will be a bit faster. But film photography is not about money. It&#039;s about using cameras which puts  you in direct control of all the technical parameters, through simple and intuitive commands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment.<br />
In all fairness I have to say that it&#8217;s getting increasingly difficult to get film processed at an acceptable price. The payback of a Leica M9 will be a bit faster. But film photography is not about money. It&#8217;s about using cameras which puts  you in direct control of all the technical parameters, through simple and intuitive commands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leica M9 &#8211; a few thoughts by Paul Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2009/09/10/leica-m9-a-few-thoughts/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Greenwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=552#comment-545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just been looking at your views on cameras and their heritage. Easy to understand and no techno-babble. Thanks for that at least. Regarding your last views on the Liecas, I was shaking with laughter (and agreement) at your no-nonsense approach. Your &#039;math&#039; was to-the-point and absolutely without fault. I&#039;m glad someone with your obvious wealth of (amateur) knowledge has the courage to speak out against the rediculously wealthy &#039;bling-merchants&#039; who seem to want these obscenely priced ornaments written into the history books. I&#039;ve just completed an A-level photography course at my local college as a mature student (I&#039;m 50) using my cheap and cheerful Sony Alpha 350. An easy camera to use but the temptation is to leave it on &#039;auto&#039; all the time thereby almost guarantee-ing reasonable results. I also have an Olympus 0m2n with a selection of lenses and an outo winder. THIS is where the enjoyment of photography comes alive for me. Pre-focusing for moving subjects, composing my image in the viewfinder carefully, adjusting the shutter/aperture for clarity or depth of field. And the knowledge that if it falls off the seat of my car when I go round a corner I don&#039;t have to call the insurance company because it hasn&#039;t broken in thirty years and is unlikely to do so now!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just been looking at your views on cameras and their heritage. Easy to understand and no techno-babble. Thanks for that at least. Regarding your last views on the Liecas, I was shaking with laughter (and agreement) at your no-nonsense approach. Your &#8216;math&#8217; was to-the-point and absolutely without fault. I&#8217;m glad someone with your obvious wealth of (amateur) knowledge has the courage to speak out against the rediculously wealthy &#8216;bling-merchants&#8217; who seem to want these obscenely priced ornaments written into the history books. I&#8217;ve just completed an A-level photography course at my local college as a mature student (I&#8217;m 50) using my cheap and cheerful Sony Alpha 350. An easy camera to use but the temptation is to leave it on &#8216;auto&#8217; all the time thereby almost guarantee-ing reasonable results. I also have an Olympus 0m2n with a selection of lenses and an outo winder. THIS is where the enjoyment of photography comes alive for me. Pre-focusing for moving subjects, composing my image in the viewfinder carefully, adjusting the shutter/aperture for clarity or depth of field. And the knowledge that if it falls off the seat of my car when I go round a corner I don&#8217;t have to call the insurance company because it hasn&#8217;t broken in thirty years and is unlikely to do so now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And now for something completely different: the Polaroid PoGo Instant Printer by OyakhilomeDavids</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2010/06/19/and-now-for-something-completely-different-the-polaroid-pogo-printer/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OyakhilomeDavids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=1698#comment-427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulation on your innovation for the Pogo instant print camera. It is indeed a welcome development. It would be more appreciated if can be upgraded to a 4 by 6 inches output for commercial purpose. Thanks and I do hope you take this comment into cosideration.

Oyakhilome D.
Nigeria.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulation on your innovation for the Pogo instant print camera. It is indeed a welcome development. It would be more appreciated if can be upgraded to a 4 by 6 inches output for commercial purpose. Thanks and I do hope you take this comment into cosideration.</p>
<p>Oyakhilome D.<br />
Nigeria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why are manual exposure cameras worth more than automatics ? by dave harris</title>
		<link>http://cameragx.com/2010/03/22/why-are-manual-exposure-cameras-worth-more-than-automatic/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameragx.com/?p=1546#comment-404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nikon f2 titanium with zeiss zf lenses - the ultimate mechanical camera with superlative build quality and mechanical excellance. prospective durability from the titanium finish and features such as a mirror lock. I would combine this with a leica m4 rangefinder camera and a rolleiflex f2.8f tlr and add the canon eos 5d mk11 for digital and that would comprise my ultimate camera collection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nikon f2 titanium with zeiss zf lenses &#8211; the ultimate mechanical camera with superlative build quality and mechanical excellance. prospective durability from the titanium finish and features such as a mirror lock. I would combine this with a leica m4 rangefinder camera and a rolleiflex f2.8f tlr and add the canon eos 5d mk11 for digital and that would comprise my ultimate camera collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

